Zhong's profileZhong ChenPhotosBlogListsMore  |  Tools Help |
Zhong Chen陈众 |
|||||||
|
March 30 传说中的朱童鞋。。。引言：很早就想写一篇有关留学生的心理健康评论（对于一个即将踏上这条路的我也有借鉴之处
 ）。终于有时间好好探讨一位前些日子很出名的朱童鞋事件。案例：据说朱童鞋毕业于上海水产大学，英语很好。按照国内毕业学校的档次，能到VT（牛校），我觉得这个是很出色的申请结果。申请的牛人。貌似他跟朋友说学习压力很大，担心没有奖学金，而且更喜欢金融，想转专业。但是金融行业垮了，似乎他的股票也赔光了，经济上损失很大，而且女的给他雪上加霜，1/7号朱海洋就在blog里说想自杀或者杀人。杀人的刀，应该是提前准备好的，昨天去见面就是要打算砍了小姑娘。女的把他列为emergent contact，看来是申请的时候跟朱很熟悉了，网上有人揣测是利用完朱后踹了，不知道是否是对死者的污蔑还是真实情况，不过，的确有些女的是利用男的来美国然后一路高升一路踹 --- 复杂点的有前Iowa state的某女助教，现在该人已经从该系主页上消失了。 启示：首先，要看透人这一辈子，都是要利用人和被人利用的，没什么值得痛恨的。如果“利用”这个词语不好听，就是高尚点的说法，“人人为我，我为人人”。关键是自己得看开了，不要计较一时得失。
其次，人要学会处理压力。申请完了是学习；学习不满意可能要换导师转专业；学习完了是要毕业；毕业完了还要就业；就业完了是绿卡；绿卡的同时还有公司里的升迁甚至失业再就业；有了工作还要买车买房，要还贷款，如果同时失业就更糟糕。恋爱之后要结婚，结婚以后难免跟父母跟家庭有冲突，结婚以后很多人要孩子，养孩子就更不是一般的麻烦（有点扯远了  ）。人这一辈子永远都是都是在压力和解决压力中度过的。朱童鞋倒在了前面，后面的事情他连尝试的机会都没有了。最后，还是那句老话，学会笑傲江湖。有钱但是没了girl，很多男的还是可以接受的。两手空空就另当别论了。当然，能把人头割下来，朱童鞋也够狠够变态。  March 29 分手后还是朋友分手后还是朋友 这句话在我的心头已久 习惯了默默地关注着你 在我生命的每一个站头 分手后还是朋友 这句话被你遗忘很久 明明知道无法结果 仍然记得你那醉人的回笑一眸 分手后还是朋友 也许只是我一厢的念头 既然爱你要勇于说出口 那么为何又要给我无法磨灭的伤口 分手后还是朋友 只能对着你的相片念叨着曾经拥有 明白爱你已经覆水难收 那就学着让它随波逐流 谨祝你一路顺风 我亲爱的 ——朋友
Comments on “Casablanca”When I first watch the movie called "Casablanca", which is considered as one of the most classic movies all over the world, depicting an impressive story about what a hero was supposed to act when encountering the dilemma that he had no choice but to decide to either behave gentle like a patriot or a limited and narrow minded person who always conceived of revenge because of being hurt by love under a war background. And I would say yes, this movie as a masterpiece stands the test of time, being passed generation to generation and still remaining a great attraction to contemporaries nowadays. First of all, what appeals to me is its special theme in which love, patriotic and obligation--all of them are twisted and tangled each other. This movie was launched by Hollywood during World War Two, talking about an American named Rick Blaine opened a very prevailing nightclub in Casablanca and he owned two precious permission cards which was indispensable for those who wanted to escape from European cities ruled by Nazi Germany to the US. One day, antifascist leader named Victor Laszlo and his wife Ilsa came to the club planned to get permission cards with the help of Rick. However, when Rick found that Ilsa was just his lover a few years ago, he hesitated. After the misunderstanding between them was clarified and Rick decided to help the couple escapes from Casablanca. At last, he shot a Nazi officer named Strasser who tried to hinder from the couple’s leave, staring at the departure of his lover. What a moving scene! On the one hand, this movie reminds people of the cruelty of wars and alerts us not to forget about how pain and discomfort a war brings to us and how precious peace is. I am sure that even those who have not experienced war times will be definitely affected and moved by the pictures the movie shows to us. For example, there is a scenery that in the club, the Nazi officer Strasser conducted his underlings to sing a song about their so called glory aggressions while the antifascist leader Laszlo encouraged the rest of common people in that club to sing “La Marseillaise”—French national chorus. And it turned out to be a contest and battle between good and evil and of course, the former won. What a meaningful scene. On the other hand, in addition to the patriotic scene, what shock me most are those that are relevant to strong love during the war. Accompanied by the leading rhyme of the song “as time goes by”, the leading character Rick and Ilsa met in a room that implied the climax’s coming. I hardly can control my emotion any longer because Rick eventually showed his generous love to Ilsa and sense of responsibility to beat evil of Nazi. There is no denying that it indeed encouraged lots of people during their hard times. In a conclusion, I believe that this movie is worthy to watching and needed to be re-enjoyed couples of times because of what it conveys referring to a profound inspiration about bravery, obligation and love that a true man should possess. Comments on "The Tiger"William Blake (1757-1827) was regarded in his time as very strange. Although nowadays people view tiger as a kind of symbol of wild animal, I still feel confused when I first notice that a famous poet who lived in 19th century had described it and as considered it as a sign. But the question is what does it exactly mean about the emblem? In spite of existing confusion that we do not confirm what the writer would want to convey to us, it is still evident that the tiger he describes is powerful and mighty. First, Blake's spelling in the title "The Tiger" at once suggests the distinguished or alien quality of the beast. The memorable opening couplet (pair of rhyming lines) points to the contrast of the dark "forest of the night" and the intense "burning" brightness of the tiger's coloring: It seems that Blake depicts with a pair of painter's eyes. Then, Blake presents a question that embodies the theme: Who created the tiger? Was it the kind and loving God who made the lamb? Or was it Satan? Blake presents his question in the following sentences (What immoral hand or eye/ could frame thy fearful symmetry?) Also, Blake asks in the poem that where the fire in the tiger's eyes originates. It seems that a brave person (or maybe the God) seizes this fire and puts it into the tiger. Here, I remember that Prometheus stole fire from the gods in order to bring brightness to men in Greek myth. What a similar coincidence! Besides, the poet is amazed by the complicated inner drive of the tiger and the mighty heart beats of strength so that he also thinks how the brain of such a kind of animal is created: "What the hammer...in what furnace...what the anvil?" At last, the writer realizes that God made all the creatures on earth. However, he also bewilders: Is tiger really created by the God? If it is true, why does the God who creates the gentle lamb also create the terrifying tiger? The poem ends appropriately with the same question with which it started, but the change of verb from "could" to "dare" makes it much stronger. The poem does not so much explore the question that what really tiger is, as the poet tries to tell us what the true meaning of tiger is from a perspective of a zoologist or an observer. I think, Blake considers the tiger as a masterpiece of the God which exists on the earth with amazing combination of beauty and strength. 浅谈俄制战机应如何抗衡于美制战机今天是时事评论栏目的第一天。作为一个军事时事评论的爱好者，我将尽可能每个星期发表一篇文章。欢迎大家探讨，指点和批评。 下面就俄罗斯的战机，以苏30或者最近刚出的苏35等苏系列和美国研制的F18到F22甚至最近新装备F35的系列，我发表一下个人意见。首先，俄罗斯的战机素来是以其优异的机动近距离格斗技能闻名于世。而美国的战机则采取“先发现，先打击，先撤离”的战术配合所谓的超远视距打击而傲视群雄。一远一近，两种不一样战机战斗策略，是由其战机本身的性能决定。 论点：对于夺得制空权的未来的俄罗斯战机欲想和美制战机抗衡，最重要的发展重点是发展其隐身性能。（此时，你一定会对我的观点不屑一顾。你会问为什么不是机动能力，不是火控雷达，不是航电系统或者武器系统。）好，说话是要靠证据的。 论据：美制战机实施所谓的超视距打击，具体讲就是假定两架战机（苏35和F35）在战场上的距离300公里外F35雷达早已探测到敌机雷达波，再马上发射“发射后不需要管”的对空导弹攻击，而这种导弹在接近敌机150-200公里左右自动会利用惯性制导直扑向敌机。因为苏式战机的探测距离较近加上即使其探测距离足够，由于F35优良的隐身性（据称雷达反射截面只有0.01平方米，类似小鸟飞过），相同条件下，像苏27和F15的雷达反射面积都超过10。F16，F18。米格29的雷达反射面积5-6左右。米格21，F5等反射面积2-3左右。我们的飞豹因该和苏27差不多，都是12左右。J-10的情况不清楚，按10的大小来看因该和F16的雷达反射面积相当，据说10采用了一定的隐身技术，不过也不可能降太多，最多和米格21差不多。F-22 RCS为0.06-0.1；F-117 RCS为0.01-0.08。所以苏战机像是瞎子一样首先被人打了个大耳光被打趴下了还没有发现对手在哪里。这怎么打？所以有些人说苏机和美机的某系列空战比分10-30啊之类的，都是胡扯因为根本不是一个档次比较的（虽然我也承认实战中有人操作和环境的因素影响）。很有可能是0-10甚至0-100。 举例：（1）虽然苏35为苏-27的高级发展型，改进了机体、发动机、机载设备和武器系统，可以根据攻击目标的不同完全自动地进行飞行模式和武器系统，可以根据攻击目标的不同完全自动地进行飞行模式和武器的控制，但该机仍然没有考虑隐身问题。 （2）美国的F22或，F35或者B2等战机的隐身性一直是美政府吹嘘的资本，即使在外销版中的隐身性也远低于本国使用的飞机。 展望：假设俄罗斯的苏霍伊公司的工程师能用至少50%以上的精力投入到隐身涂层的研究，那我认为美国的F35远不会如此嚣张。试想，两架SU-35和F-35在300公里外相遇，尽管F35优异雷达超视距，但问题是SU也只有近0.01的雷达反射截面，就是说F35没有发现SU。好戏来了。SU的雷达也没有在150-200公里处发现F35（因为F优异隐身性）。在视距范围内，就是俄SU35的优势发挥了，其优异的机动性能做响尾蛇动作等近距离格斗，正好是美式战机的薄弱处（因为美国飞行员习惯寄希望于远距打击）。在这样的条件下，SU才有资格和机会和世界霸主战机--F35一决雌雄。否则，俄罗斯战机几乎想都别想和美机抗衡。 结论：一切有志于在发展航空国防的国家，特别是继承了苏联战机优良近身格斗性能的俄罗斯和中国战机应该给予隐身性重要性足够的认识。（由于时间关系我只能浅谈个人观点。欢迎探讨） |
||||||
|
|
